A multi-device system to enhance how Alexa users interact with Hunches by making notifications more personalized and less intrusive, while increasing transparency around the impact of user feedback to encourage continued engagement.

As a UX Design Intern, I led the end-to-end research and design of the second iteration of Spaero’s MVP, focusing on improving adoption and usability for scientists. I collaborated with the founder, lead designer, and PM to prioritize feature development, designing two key features from the ground up and achieving a 38% increase in customer satisfaction

Timeline & Status

3 Months, June 2023 - Sep 2023

Team

1 UX lead

1 PM

1 Automation engineer

5 Devs

1 UX intern (me)

Platform

Web application

My Role

UX intern

Contribution

Primary research

Competitor analysis

Concept ideation

Prototyping

High-fidelity designs

Overview

When I joined Spaero, the team had already launched an initial MVP for their lab automation platform. My role was to improve the next version by observing scientists in real lab environments using automated liquid handler setups.


I led the end-to-end redesign of the experiment creation and simulation workflows, identifying usability gaps through research. I proposed workflow improvements, mapped user journeys, and prototyped new features to better align with scientists’ needs.


Following my internship, the features I designed were tested with users, resulting in a ~38% increase in user satisfaction based on usability testing.

Problem context

Lab automation has scaled up experiments while allowing scientists to focus on high-level science

Healthcare and pharmaceuticals have undergone a profound transformation over the years, shifting from traditional approaches to highly advanced and technology-driven systems.

Traditional Life Sciences

Modern Life Sciences

But despite its advantages, lab automation has a high barrier to entry, leading to slower adoption

Steep learning curve

OEM softwares are difficult to learn and are not intuitive enough for first-time users to adopt

Scientists manually run experiments

Scientists prefer to do things by hand which is inefficient and prone to errors

Requires an automation engineer

For high-throughput experiments, automation is a must and needs an additional automation engineer

Gaps in knowledge transfer

Due to differing expertise between scientists and automation engineers, experiments are more error prone due to gaps in knowledge transfer

Caregiving often feels like a second job—one that most aren’t prepared for. Caregivers must juggle multiple roles and responsibilities, often all at once, with little guidance or support.

A desktop web application that streamlines the creation and debugging of lab automation experiments through intuitive workflows, enhanced transparency, and alignment with scientists’ mental models.

Final solution

library of materials

This step organizes reusable experiment components, such as liquids, reagents, and labware, into a structured system. Scientists can define starting contents, volumes, and concentrations for each material, making setup faster and more consistent across experiments.

Pain points addressed:

Reduced barrier to entry

Easier experiment creation

Build experiment step-by-step

A more visual drag-and-drop mode of creating experiments from the previously created library of materials. This flow follows the mental model of the scientist and allows them to easily retrace their steps in case of errors.

Pain points addressed:

Reduced barrier to entry

Easier experiment creation

note-taking

This step bridges the scientist’s real-world benchwork with the digital experiment setup. Scientists can capture notes or upload images at each step, preserving their thought process and ensuring consistency between planning and execution.

Pain points addressed:

Reduced barrier to entry

simulation of experiment

A pre-run simulation screen visualizes the location, volume, and concentration of each liquid at every step. By making each action transparent, it helps scientists spot and correct errors before executing the actual experiment.

Pain points addressed:

Better transparency during runtime

Tracking the experiment from the POV of a single liquid

A focused view that filters the simulation by a single liquid, allowing scientists to trace its movement, volume, and concentration across all locations throughout the experiment. This helps ensure every action involving the selected liquid is clearly tracked from start to finish.

Pain points addressed:

Better transparency during runtime

  • What type of experiments do scientists typically perform

  • What is their typical process like

  • When does lab automation help them vs hurt them

  • At what points in their process do they face issues

I interviewed and shadowed scientists and researchers in university biochemistry labs to better understand their workflow

Research

My research was fairly open-ended and I aimed to understand the following:

Most scientists followed a typical workflow from designing the experiment manually, to building and execution on the liquid handler robot

How might we help scientists automate lab experiments by making the process more intuitive and transparent

Project scope

I got together with the founder, PM and design lead to decide which user needs to focus on for version 2 of the MVP

Reduced barrier to entry

Users needed the process of automating experiments to match their mental model

Easier experiment creation

Users needed a more intuitive way to reference lab equipment when creating experiments

Better transparency during runtime

Users needed better traceability of liquid and labware movements during runtime

User needs

I performed a competitor analysis to identify common gaps in existing products and refine the focus of the user needs uncovered during research

Choice of competitors

Based on brand popularity

Analysis lenses

Ease of use, barrier to entry, transparency of system status

The competitors I analyzed had common drawbacks that presented me with design opportunities

Complicated labware definition

The process of defining starting liquids, volumes, concentrations, and labware was confusing

Unintuitive experiment creation

Experiment creation didn’t follow the scientist’s mental model

Unintuitive simulations

Simulations lacked key details like volumes and concentrations that were important to the experiment

I had multiple concept ideas, so I created quick prototypes and presented them to my team for feedback

Ideation

Tooltips

This feature provides first-time users with tooltips through each step of the process to provide them with quick, contextual guidance as they navigate the product.

Idea scrapped

Why?

It did not make sense for a minimum viable product. It could be the focus of a more established product.

Real images of labware in library

Using real product images instead of illustrations helps scientists more accurately choose equipment.

Idea scrapped

Why?

It did not make sense for a minimum viable product. Also, product images from different manufacturers were not readily available.

Renaming labware

This feature enables users to rename labware from complex technical terms to simpler ones, making it easier to reference during experiment setup and execution.

Pushed to future iteration

Why?

The team liked the idea but it did not match the vision for the MVP.

I handed off the designs to the design lead and PM to perform user testing on our clients

Testing and impact

Conclusion and Learnings

I thoroughly enjoyed worked on this project. It was my entry into a pretty niche industry which was interesting but also came with a lot of challenges

A highly closeted industry

Getting onboarded into the industry was difficult as there were not many publicly available resources and most major players in life sciences kept their products and services close to the vest. Most companies were B2B.

Limited access to target users

I was working remotely for a smaller startup with limited customers. Therefore, my access to users was limited to those in academia and in my city.

Difficulty in measuring impact

I was working on the next version of the product while the rest of my team worked on the MVP. This made it harder to visualize and measure impact. My work did not end up getting implemented.

Let’s work together!

© 2025 Rohan Pinto